Summary:
- Ethereum Foundation unstaked over 17,000 ETH worth around $40 million.
- Move comes shortly after nearing its 70,000 ETH staking target.
- Funds are being withdrawn via Lido and will unlock after the queue clears
- No official reason given, sparking speculation around potential selling or treasury shifts
The Ethereum Foundation has stepped back from its recent staking push, unstaking more than 17,000 ETH just as it approached its internal milestone of 70,000 staked Ether. On-chain data from Arkham shows that 17,035.326 ETH, valued at roughly $40 million, was moved out of staking positions on Saturday.
The transaction was routed through Lido, where the Foundation deposited wrapped staked ETH (wstETH) into the protocol's unstaking contract. From there, the funds enter a withdrawal queue before being released back as liquid ETH. The move comes right after months of steady accumulation, where the Foundation had been building its staking position in phases. The unstake effectively pauses that trend, at least for now. To understand the significance, it helps to look at how staking works. When ETH is staked, it's locked into Ethereum's validation system, helping secure the network while earning rewards.
READ MORE: Arbitrum Freezes 30,766 ETH worth of $71M Linked to Kelp Hack
From Aggressive Staking to Sudden Unwind
The Ethereum Foundation's staking journey followed a policy shift in mid-2025, when the organization signaled a more active approach to managing its treasury. Instead of relying only on ETH sales, the Foundation began staking and exploring decentralized finance as ways to generate income. The idea was earned from the treasury work while still supporting long-term ecosystem growth. Since then, the buildup has been consistent. It started with just over 2,000 ETH in February. Then came a larger addition of more than 22,000 ETH in March. Earlier this month, the Foundation added over 45,000 ETH in multiple transactions, bringing its total close to 69,500 ETH. That number wasn't random. It aligned closely with a reported internal target of 70,000 ETH.
However, The sudden shift has raised questions. The Foundation has not publicly explained the move, leaving room for speculation. Some observers believe it could be part of a broader treasury adjustment. Others think it might signal preparation for future spending or even potential selling. One user reaction captured the tone of the discussion:

The Foundation has faced similar criticism in the past whenever it moves large amounts of ETH. But the reality is often more complex. Unstaking doesn't necessarily mean selling. It simply makes the funds available. Beyond short-term speculation, the move touches on a deeper conversation around Ethereum's structure and governance. Large-scale staking by a central entity like the Ethereum Foundation has always been a sensitive topic. While staking helps secure the network, concentration of stake can raise concerns about influence, especially during critical decisions. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has previously addressed this point. He warned that if the Foundation controls too much staked ETH, it could complicate neutrality in situations like contentious upgrades or chain splits. In those moments, large validators can shape outcomes, even indirectly.
However, the Foundation still needs liquidity. Running research, funding developers, and supporting ecosystem projects all require capital. Staked ETH is productive, but it's also locked. Unstaking brings flexibility back. Ethereum's role is evolving, with growing institutional attention, staking participation, and tighter supply dynamics. Moves by the Foundation are now watched more closely because they can signal shifts in strategy.
Closing Thoughts
For now, the situation remains open. The ETH is in the withdrawal queue, the Foundation hasn't provided further details, and the network continues to operate as usual. But the decision itself adds another layer to how the Ethereum Foundation is managing its treasury.
READ MORE : Ethereum Foundation Sells $24M in ETH to Bitmine as Treasury Strategy Evolves