news

Kraken is replacing LayerZero with Chainlink CCIP for cross-chain transfers of kBTC and future wrapped assets

Nidhi Saini
Published: May 14, 2026
5 min read
Kraken is replacing LayerZero with Chainlink CCIP for cross-chain transfers of kBTC and future wrapped assets

STAY UPDATED WITH COTI

Follow COTI across social media platforms to get the latest news, updates and community discussions.

Make us preferred on Google

Summary:

  • Crypto exchange Kraken is replacing LayerZero with Chainlink CCIP for cross-chain transfers of kBTC and future wrapped assets.
  • The decision follows the $292 million Kelp exploit, which raised fresh concerns around legacy bridge security.
  • More than $3 billion in total value locked is now shifting toward Chainlink-powered infrastructure.
  • Kraken says Chainlink CCIP meets stricter institutional security requirements, including ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications.
  • The migration signals a wider shift in how exchanges are approaching cross-chain risk management after several high-profile bridge failures. 

Kraken is making a major change to its wrapped assets move across blockchains. The crypto exchange confirmed it is retiring LayerZero as its cross-chain provider and moving to Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol, better known as CCIP. Going forward, Chainlink will serve as the exclusive bridge infrastructure for Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) and any wrapped assets Kraken launches in the future. The shift comes after concerns around cross-chain bridge security following April's $292 million exploit involving Kelp, one of the largest bridge-related losses this year. Kraken announced the move publicly, stating:

" Kraken is deprecating its existing cross-chain provider and migrating to @Chainlink CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain infra to secure Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) & all future Kraken Wrapped Assets." Source

For many in crypto, It reflects a broader rethink around how value should move between chains after repeated failures exposed weaknesses in older bridge models. Cross-chain infrastructure has become one of crypto's biggest attack surfaces. Billions have been lost over the past few years as hackers repeatedly exploited messaging layers, verification systems and weak validator setups. Kraken's move suggests large exchanges treat bridge security as a core part of platform trust. The migration affects wrapped assets across multiple chains, including Ethereum, Ink, Optimism and Unichain, with more integrations expected over time. Kraken originally introduced kBTC in 2024 as a fully backed 1:1 wrapped Bitcoin product designed to give users Bitcoin liquidity across decentralized ecosystems while keeping reserves under Kraken custody. That custody model remains unchanged. But changes the transport layer moving those assets across networks.

READ MORE: Crypto and AI Face Trust Crisis as Millions Flow Into 2026 Elections, New Poll Shows

Why the Kelp Exploit Changed the Conversation

The timing of Kraken's announcement arrives just weeks after the Kelp exploit forced much of the industry to confront the risks hidden inside bridge architecture. Kelp lost 116,500 rsETH through a LayerZero-powered bridge setup in April, marking the largest bridge exploit of 2026 so far. The breach triggered immediate scrutiny across the ecosystem. Later, LayerZero acknowledged that its verifier network configuration used for high-value asset security had flaws. The company admitted it had "made a mistake" by allowing its own verifier setup to secure assets under that structure.

For years, many projects accepted cross-chain messaging systems as trusted middleware. But incidents like this have shown that bridge trust assumptions can quietly become systemic risks. Since the exploit, platforms including Kelp, Solv and Re have all announced infrastructure migrations. Combined, more than $3 billion in total value locked has now shifted toward alternative security frameworks. Kraken's decision adds significant weight to that trend. Large centralized exchanges usually move cautiously when replacing core infrastructure. The process involves technical audits, compliance checks and operational risk assessments that can take months. So when Kraken makes this kind of change, it sends a message to the rest of the market. Security expectations have changed and legacy systems are being judged more harshly.

Why Kraken Chose Chainlink

Kraken says the choice came down to institutional-grade reliability. The company highlighted several reasons for selecting Chainlink CCIP, including security certifications and architectural safeguards that align more closely with enterprise standards. Kraken explained:

" Kraken chose Chainlink CCIP because it offers enterprise-grade infrastructure with strict security & risk management requirements, including:
• ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications
• Secure by default architecture
• 16 independent nodes
• Native rate limits, and more. " Source 

However, it addresses many of the weaknesses bridge critics have pointed out for years. Independent node operators reduce centralized failure risk, rate limits can stop abnormal transfer behavior before damage spreads. Also, formal compliance certifications help satisfy institutional partners who require clearer auditability and operational controls. Chainlink has steadily expanded beyond its original oracle business into broader infrastructure services for tokenized finance and cross-chain asset movement. Its CCIP product has gained traction among major financial players because it combines decentralized validation with predictable operational safeguards.

Coinbase selected Chainlink CCIP last year as the sole bridge infrastructure for roughly $7 billion in wrapped token liquidity. That decision gave Chainlink significant credibility among institutions exploring tokenized assets and regulated onchain settlement systems. Kraken's migration reinforces that position. Under the setup, Chainlink CCIP will handle asset transfers using its Cross-Chain Token standard, while Kraken will continue issuing and custodying the wrapped assets themselves. This separation keeps asset backing under exchange control while outsourcing transport security to specialized infrastructure.

READ MORE: Iran War and AI Spending Could Push Bitcoin to $126K in 2026, Says Arthur Hayes

About the Project


About the Author

Nidhi Saini

Nidhi Saini

Nidhi Saini is a writer and co-founder of CotiNews, with over four years of experience working in Web3 marketing. She brings a practitioner’s perspective to her writing, shaped by years spent understanding how blockchain products are positioned, communicated, and adopted. As a co-founder, she is also involved in shaping the platform’s editorial direction, ensuring the publication stays thoughtful, credible, and grounded.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official stance of CotiNews or the COTI ecosystem. All content published on CotiNews is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, legal, or technological advice. CotiNews is an independent publication and is not affiliated with coti.io, coti.foundation or its team. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information presented. Readers are strongly encouraged to do their own research (DYOR) before making any decisions based on the content provided. For corrections, feedback, or content takedown requests, please reach out to us at

contact@coti.news

Stay Ahead of the Chain

Subscribe to the CotiNews newsletter for weekly updates on COTI V2, ecosystem developments, builder insights, and deep dives into privacy tech and industry.
No spam. Just the alpha straight to your inbox.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.